davel@lemmy.ml to Videos@lemmy.mlEnglish · 11 days agoThe China They Don't Want You to See: Xinjiangwww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square351fedilinkarrow-up169arrow-down18
arrow-up161arrow-down1external-linkThe China They Don't Want You to See: Xinjiangwww.youtube.comdavel@lemmy.ml to Videos@lemmy.mlEnglish · 11 days agomessage-square351fedilink
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·11 days ago your speculation doesn’t change the nature of any official figures or sources. Which you still haven’t provided.
minus-squarebitofarambler@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down7·11 days agoit’s not surprising you can’t find them in the flood of comments, which particular sources for my comments are you looking for?
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·11 days agoAll the ones I’ve repeatedly asked you for. And I have read all the comment, you didn’t give them.
minus-squareKuroXppi [they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·11 days agoDamb, you could maybe like, link us to the comment where you shared the sources even
minus-squarebitofarambler@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down7·11 days agoyou wouldn’t even believe the amount of comments coming in. people are really excited about these decade-old numbers for some reason. it’s easier at this point to provide you with a new source for a specific figure rather than comb through the older comments.
minus-squareKuroXppi [they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·11 days agoOkay do that then
Which you still haven’t provided.
it’s not surprising you can’t find them in the flood of comments, which particular sources for my comments are you looking for?
All the ones I’ve repeatedly asked you for. And I have read all the comment, you didn’t give them.
Damb, you could maybe like, link us to the comment where you shared the sources even
you wouldn’t even believe the amount of comments coming in.
people are really excited about these decade-old numbers for some reason.
it’s easier at this point to provide you with a new source for a specific figure rather than comb through the older comments.
Okay do that then