• voracitude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    And the last reason to even consider using it goes out the window 🙄 Thanks for the heads-up.

      • voracitude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because it wasn’t based on the Chrome engine (initially, anyway). That’s actually a significant enough reason to at least consider it. I’ve never used Opera precisely because of its origins (honestly I thought it was Russian, though there’s not much practical difference in this case), but innovation is innovation. The fewer non-Chrome browsers exist, the worse off we all are.

        • BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ah, didn’t know how old that doc was. Opera only switched to Chrome in 2013 or so.

          But yeah, I agree. That’s why I support Ladybird’s and Servo’s development. They are the best bet to help stop the duopoly. If only Opera would BSD-license and open source their Presto Engine I would love to see someone pick up development of that. Instead we get Opera putting jumpscares in their browser .

          • voracitude@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve not even heard of those two, I’ve stuck with Firefox for so long. I’ll check them out, thanks!