• 520@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 months ago

    It ain’t about people they don’t like, it’s about a powerful corporation known to be abusive, psychologically manipulative and unafraid to break laws so long as it benefits them.

    You wouldn’t want such an entity under your roof either

    • TwilightVulpine@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      No, but I would like to bring some of my friends and family members who use Facebook over to the Fediverse, and I believe it’s easier if they can already see what it’s like.

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Then give them a URL link to a good instance.

        Do you really expect Threads to provide a fair, uncompromised experience of the Fediverse when it’s actively against their interests to do so?

        • TwilightVulpine@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          If you think just linking an URL is enough to persuade people to join, either you are surrounded by exceptionally tech savvy people, or you never actually tried. Getting some people to make a Mastodon account is harder than pulling teeth.

          But if they were already peeking from the window, maybe they just might.

          You have a point Threads will definitely try to skew the experience in some way, but if they make it too bad, they will be the ones looking bad for it, because the average Meta user doesn’t even know what the Fediverse is. So they need to show some good stuff too.

          And really, I don’t know who is it that y’all are imagining that dropped Facebook and Twitter for ActivityPub, but they’ll jump back in as soon as they get a whiff. I actually tried Threads. It sucks. Why would folks give up on the Fediverse for it?