• Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “We will do something about it”, “we’re not sure if we are going to do something” and “no we won’t do something” seem like three distinct answers to me. Saying the last one would be a much more definite no than just “we’ll see”. Saying the US refuses to back it makes it sound like the last one imo, which would be a bit misleading.

    • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      But we are not talking about “The toilet paper in the school restrooms seems to always be empty.” We are talking about the uncovering of mass graves with strong indications of women and children being executed. Anything below immediate action on the matter is a form of opposition to it.

      Or in other words, when you call the firefighters because your house is on fire then “we’ll see if we will do something about the fire, maybe, maybe not.” means that they will let your house burn down.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Firefighters have the assumption that it’s their job to do something about it. I don’t think the same is true for USA here. But even in the firefighter example in news headlines I’d make a distinction between them telling you they’re refusing and them waiting and seeing if their presence is necessary. It makes sense for a news headline imo.