• GladiusB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Wait, what? Were you alive in the 90s? It was radically different. We were in a world we didn’t want but we still respected the government. We fought for our individualism. We wanted to be judged on our merit rather than our piercings or tattoos or baggy clothes. It mirrors the 60s in so many ways.

    The biggest societal difference was the Internet. Our connection was through the people and events. We took pictures here and there and we could share them. But it’s not like it is now. You would trust the local doctor if you had a big lump on your neck if they had a diagnosis. Rather than going on to the Internet and finding some obscure disease to seem cool.

    It’s such a big shift it’s hard to encapsulate in just one statement. It’s a big discussion.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      Our attitude on homosexuality is wildly different.

      The question "Homosexuals should have the right to Marry (agree/disagree) was asked in the GSS in 1988, 2004, 2021, and 2022.

      People who answered “Agree” or “Strongly Agree”

      2022: 67% 2021: 64% 2004: 30% 1988: 11%

      The movie came out in 1997. In 1996 and 1998 (and many other years), the GSS asked people’s opinion on the morality of gay sex. Nearly 70% found gay sex to be immoral.

    • filtoid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Can only speak to the UK, but in the 90s women drinking pints of beer was so radical that they got their own name - ladettes, which also tied into the Girl Power movement (might have been third-wave feminism adjacent? Idk)

      These days if a woman drinks a beer nobody would even bat an eyelid, it’s just such an unusual thing to think that was ever considered not normal. This is just one case, but it’s indicative of one way that society has progressed. There are many more examples of such societal changes.

      Your statement prompted me to think back to when the BBC used to run stories on the dangers of uppity Ladettes and what that might mean for the establishment.