It was only in the early 1980s that the first tangible evidence connecting a toxicant with neurodegeneration came to light. In a tragic experiment of nature, a group of drug users in California accidentally injected themselves with a bad batch of designer heroin and began suffering from symptoms closely resembling those of Parkinson’s disease. Investigators traced the batch to a back-alley chemist who had synthesized the drugs and found that he had mistakenly created a neurotoxin precursor known as MPTP as part of the concoction. As it turned out, MPTP also resembled aspects of the chemical makeup of paraquat, a common herbicide, opening the door to the notion that perhaps chronic exposure to synthetic toxins was triggering Parkinson’s in aging patients the same way that the bad batch of heroin had in the users. Since then, advancements in molecular and genetic testing have continued to reinforce the idea. Recent studies have linked brain disorders with chronic exposure to cyanobacterial blooms, pesticides, air pollution and numerous other toxicants. Some researchers have gone so far as to describe Parkinson’s disease in particular as “man-made.”
So poison is bad for us, huh? It’s a little crazy that no one wondered if something designed to kill, even if it’s not designed to kill humans, would maybe not be good for us to be exposed to.
When somebody discussed the vaccine causing autism conspiracy, I’d start arguing how pollution caused autism and fossil fuel companies are trying to cover this up. Nobody wants to discuss conspiracies anymore with me.
The overlap between “chemtrails” and “fluoride in the water” and “epa bad” is pretty high. It’s actually kinda odd.
Science is about verifying things no matter how “obvious”. Lots of obvious common sense things have been disproven.
It’s quite significant as further research process that people living in rural areas (close to fields where pesticides are used) showed higher amount of parkinson’s cases.
So it’s very relevant to prove this connection, so that legislation can be put into place to protect people from potentially catching Parkinson’s.
It’s always a question of cost to benefit ratio.