• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    And you’re thus continuing to be wrong.

    Deliberate and obvious hyperbole to emphasize a valid point is NOT a strawman, nor is it equivalent.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      You think if you can justify a strawman, it isn’t one.

      That’s not how it works.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        …are you going for a record in hypocrisy and stubborn ignorance or something?

        What you just said was a strawman in defense of a categorically false claim.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          First off, with all this philosophy larping, there’s a thing called “the fallacy fallacy”, which states it’ fallacious to imply someone is wrong simply because their logic was fallacious.

          Secondly, me reminding you of how these things work doesn’t mean I’m suddenly “defending a false claim”, especially not with strawmen.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            First off, with all this philosophy larping, there’s a thing called “the fallacy fallacy”, which states it’ fallacious to imply someone is wrong simply because their logic was fallacious

            It is, however, never a fallacy to point out that a fallacious accusation of fallacy is false. Now say that three times quickly.

            Secondly, me reminding you of how these things work doesn’t mean I’m suddenly “defending a false claim”, especially not with strawmen.

            It is when, as in this case, are wrong about “how these things work” and also about what’s even going on. Just take the L and move on, dude. We’ve both wasted far too much time on your bullshit already.

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Larp all you want, that won’t make your comment at the top of this thread be any less fallacious.

              Me pointing out that it was fallacious, which it is, doesn’t mean I’m engaging in the argument. It just means I’m tired of people like you larping they know philosophy when they can barely be bothered to skim the Wikipedia entries on the subject.

              I’m not wasting time. I’m enjoying my time on Lemmy. Aren’t you?