I’ve discovered that it’s a horrible screen font, though: far too spindly to be easily readable. I still use it, but I have to make it larger than usual and bold, and it’s still a little hard to make out sometimes.
I think the font heavily reuses glyphs. 0 probably literally is the same glyph as O. I’m positive 9 is just a rotated 6 (I guess that’s pretty common, although it’s really obvious in Poiret).
I really love the numbers, though.
I’ve discovered that it’s a horrible screen font, though: far too spindly to be easily readable. I still use it, but I have to make it larger than usual and bold, and it’s still a little hard to make out sometimes.
Oh, what we sacrifice for aesthetics.
0 seems a bit too indistinguishable from O, but otherwise I’m also a big fan of the numbers.
I think the font heavily reuses glyphs. 0 probably literally is the same glyph as O. I’m positive 9 is just a rotated 6 (I guess that’s pretty common, although it’s really obvious in Poiret).