• Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I’m not a big M$-fan but I actually like c# a lot. Java not so much.

    I’m no pro though, I just guerilla-code in my spare time. But of all the languages it’s actually my most used. Besides PPL and ASM 😁

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 minutes ago

      C# is a great language but I’ll always choose Java because the ecosystem around it is so vast. Often times some client library you need has a c# port maintained by one guy and he hasn’t updated in years.

    • AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I have 20 years programming experience and C# is one of my favorite languages. It feels so expressive and doesn’t get in your way nearly as much as Java does. I feel like I’m writing the code I want to write instead of writing the code someone from 30 years ago with a fetish for boilerplate wanted me to write.

    • mmddmm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      Microsoft Java is one of those cases where MS got the “extend” phase so well executed that they didn’t even need to finish the plan.

      That said, the language is only good if you insist on using either it or Java. And the ecosystem around it is really, really bad.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’ve actually found C# quite pleasant to develop with, so long as I didn’t have to worry about targeting non-Windows platforms.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        True, but what I’m really talking about is the unbeatable user experience of having an application that looks and feels as if it were a native Windows application, because it is and has that first-class platform support straight from the vendor.

        With that said, most new cross platform applications today are probably more like electron or Web apps.

        • Kogasa@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Ok, there’s no such thing as native Windows apps for Linux, but there are cross platform GUI frameworks like Avalonia and Uno that can produce apps with a polished identical experience across all platforms, no electron needed

            • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Good lord, I’ve never seen anyone say this in public. I used Qt Creator for a couple of years and I found the combination of C++ for under the hood and Javascript for the UI to be a fantastic way of ensuring a nearly nonexistent base of developers who could competently do both. Maybe they grow on trees in Finland, I dunno. And maybe you’re talking about some other “Qt”, I also dunno.

              I’ve done C# and Java extensively as well and I would never choose Qt over them. I might choose Qt over Objective-C, however.

              • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 hours ago

                QML is such an awesome UI language, the only thing (that I know of) that comes close is Jetpack Compose.

                The flavour of JavaScript QML uses is very different from regular JavaScript, it’s literally a glue language and any significant non-UI logic should be done in C++.

                And Qt C++ is very different to most other C++ framework (or how people usually write pure C++), it feels much more Java-inspired.

                Anyway, it really is a great UI toolkit if you want something powerful, cross-platform and efficient.

                • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  I suppose Qt’s cross-platform aspect is a big checkmark in the plus column. My own opinion of Qt is probably colored by the fact that I was forced into it against my will and that the Finns who initially wrote the app were unhelpful and downright hostile to my attempts to customize it in ways that their customization framework did not support.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yea this was a crosspost and also just a meme, but C# is my fav

      And really cross-platform has come a LONG way…just as long as you don’t need UI on Linux lolol

    • Hugin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah C# gets a bad rap. I spent a decade developing in C++, and Java before switching to C# because of program requirements. Now I never want to go back.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’ve used many languages/platforms in my 30 years of programming (take that!), including Visual Basic, C, C#, Java, Objective-C and C++. I agree that C# is the best but not by much. They all do pretty much the same things - if one language lacks something that other languages have shown to be beneficial, that something tends to get incorporated in a future update in some form or another, and their glaring weaknesses tend to get corrected as well (like when Objective-C mostly did away with the need to explicitly release fucking everything).