• Dave@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I can’t see anywhere on the box it claims it’s fun for the entire family. It’s a two person game after all.

  • vegantomato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    25 minutes ago

    Maybe they were going to play after finishing up the dishes?

    This shitty interpretation says more about the person making the “meme” than the artist who created the original ad.

  • Tedesche@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    What? I see an entire family having fun: men with the advertised product and women with seeing their men happy.

    I don’t understand the complaints here.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This is what I don’t understand. Yes, corporations pander to marginalised demographics, but I have not once seen them lose significant income or have been boycotted. Fascist corporations, meanwhile, lost customers and stocks like Target and Tesla.

      Like really, who’s going broke? Methinks this is projection from the right, or disinformation from state or non-state actors alike to keep the population divided.

      • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Bud lite. That’s it. That’s all they’ve got. Number one beer to number three and since it’s a massive corporation, the larger entity didn’t go broke but they’re too poorly educated to understand they moved from one brand to another under the same mega corp.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        To be right wing is to be ruled by emotions. Humans are all emotional creatures, but for some people it reaches a point where emotion alone creates reality. Facts are there to be picked up or set aside to support feelings. When their guy eats ice cream it’s because he’s a man of the people. When your guy eats ice cream it’s because he’s a baby. Facts don’t matter. It’s feelings.

        And most of their feelings seem to be fear. Fear of loss. Fear of humiliation. You can show them stats and history demonstrating how, like, a diverse workforce leads to higher productivity and greater happiness, but that doesn’t matter. They’re not looking at facts. They’re feeling feelings.

        Imagine trying to talk to someone who’s drunk. That’s the right wing, except all the time and they can’t really sober up. Honestly, it sounds like hell.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I like that this demon boy is obviously holding that poor family hostage and they have to indulge his every bullshit.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    In the last frame there is a thing that looks like a post it note or a paper stuck to the wall which we don’t see in the previous two frames - and they’re all supposed to be the same image, only zoomed in. It’s too blurry to be read but it appears to have something written on it, any clues as to what that is?

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      In the before-times people would purchase objects that were displayed on “shelves”. They would pick the object up and carry it to a “cashier” who would then look at a small sticker called a “price tag” on the item, and charge the customer that amount.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Still, it’s weird that the zoomed-in image came from a different copy of the game than the other two. (Or that they took off the sticker before taking another photo, and then didn’t use that new photo for the zoomed-in image.)

        • Nate Cox@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I feel like the “ai” upscaling comment is probably right. The women in the last frame have a lot more detail and contrast, in addition to a partially illegible price tag that wasn’t there before.

          Like, it could be from a different photo, but why would the creator go find a whole different picture when they had one right in front of them?

        • dr_robotBones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It looks like its a different picture taken with a different camera. If it was just zoomed in it would be very blurry. For whatever reason they took a picture of a different box, or got images from multiple sources to make this meme.

    • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Looking at the fringes between colors, the last panel looks upscaled to me. Maybe the AI invented a price sticker?

  • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    The ship that dad is holding is sending up slop flares.

    Edit: 🤦‍♂️ I know it’s the original art. But the ship is huge, looks like it holds about 9 pegs, and the one on the left is lined up directly over a finger. 🤷‍♂️

    • archonet@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      … I can’t tell if you’re being facetious or not, but those are probably the red pegs you actually stick into the battleships in the game when your ship is hit. this is actually the box art from 1967, furthermore, I can remember seeing it before the age of slop came upon us.

      • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        I enjoy how every misplaced accusation of something being le AI le SLOP ends up just backfiring against the claim that AI only makes objectively trash things that can always be distinguished from beautiful pure human-made art. If it’s plausible that AI could have made this, then it must be plausible for AI to make art as good as humans have. What’s even better is it doesn’t matter if you can correctly distinguish it 95% of the time. Even just one misclassification is enough to undermine the claim that AI only produces #slop. The sentiment of the claim could even be saved if people were willing to say that just X% of AI art is #slop, but this is unacceptable for the dogmatist’s needs, which will only settle for 100%.

        • otacon239@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’ve been seeing the trend recently where now anything bad with uncanny valley elements must be AI. It’s just as much of a thought killer as blindly enjoying AI. This example was easy to confirm and before making an accusation, they just went “I should add doubt to the validity of the context for the sake of it.”