• hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    The rich would rather live in an apocalypse than let workers have some more of the wealth that the workers themselves have created.

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    I say that when the billionaires retreat into their bunkers we should all cover the entrances and vents with a couple hundred layers of concrete.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Electric motorcycles? Do preppers have an understanding of how gasoline absorbs water from the air and is substantially worse within a matter of months? Even with stabilizer, you get a few years out of it, tops. What are you going to use for the rest of your life?

    To be fair, the writers of post-apocalyptic Hollywood movies don’t understand it, either.

    • hello@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Create your own gasoline refining plant in your bunker and crank out fuel as you need it? Should be fine because motorcycles don’t use a lot of gas. But you would think if you had tons of money you might put some solar panel stuff in storage as well just in case

    • thejoker954@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Could always set up a refinery of sorts.

      And while gas absorbs water from the air, I’m sure there is an expensive way to if not outright prevent it, than slow it down way more than current mass adopted storage.

      Off the top of my head i imagine some sort of giant glass tank involving vaccums and check valves would at least extend the usable life by a fair amount.

      And while there are a lot of popular motorcycles whose gas mileage is little better than a car there are also a good amount with amazing gas mileage.

      There’s also the possibility of converting the motorcycles to alternate fuel sources like propane or natural gas.

      Or as these people are just rich assholes indulging in their fantasies they may really take their cue from movies.

  • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would like for them to find out the hard way that the characteristics to be a leader in a Neo-liberal capitalistic society are not the same in an apocalyptic wasteland.

    And by hard way, I mean that they would be made the fucksock of charismatic warlord.

    • Pnut@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Theres a book that an advisor for the billionaire bunkers wrote, sorry my phone is glitchy so I can’t look it up without abandoning this post. I heard an interview with him where he said he would always circle back to “if you use your vast wealth to improve these societal issues, there isn’t a need for a bunker”. They won’t hear it. They’re driving towards the apocalypse because they are all racing to be the richest. Nothing else matters.

  • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s ok, they’re gathering supplies for the people. Once things start it’ll all be in one convient place to take.

  • Billiam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t remember who said it, but I think about this comment a lot:

    All these billionaires would rather spend their wealth building bunkers for when their actions cause social collapse, instead of trying to prevent social collapse in the first place.

    • brax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      3 days ago

      The thing is, none of these bunkers are built by billionaires. Would be real unfortunate if they had some design flaws in them lol

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Probably won’t protect them from things like direct conventional bombardment of bombs or even bunker busters. Or even a nuke

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Doesn’t need to be any design flaws, a few minutes with a welder and/or a truck load of concrete at the door once they’re in there would render the whole billionaire problem “solved”, Hotel California style.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Given we’re talking about the total collapse of society, the goal in such an event would be less “keep the billionaire in” and more “get all the food and ammunition he’s hoarding out. And any women.”

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 days ago

      These assholes always fantasize that their wealth and accumulation of luxury items will grant them the leg up to become rulers during the social collapse. They don’t realize that in case of a social collapse the world won’t immediately look like Mad Max, and they certainly aren’t Immortan Joe. It will look more like Children of Man. Very slow and very gradual and with a lot mass governmental violence, not small arms violence.

    • r.EndTimes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      And they all already have, insane, there is our trickle down economics at work, they would rather hoarde and spend every last cent on a bunker right before they drop dead from old age than give back to the world

    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      Further, they don’t have what it takes to survive off the land, nor the intimidation to warlord after.

      Other than a pensioners its difficult to imagine someone more dependant on the systems.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        No wilderness survival skills, how do they know which berries to eat and which will poison you, or which animal carcass have a ton of parasites you should never eat, never eat a carnivore or an animal that eats mostly carrion.

    • paranoia@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t think they necessarily “prefer” it. It’s more just that they have what is an unimaginable amount of money in comparison to us, why not invest to preserve your long term survival?

      They have already dealt with the normal shit the rest of us have to. They have a house, car, enough money for them and their families to never work again, to do whatever hobbies they like with no restriction.

      If you are someone with a worth of a billion, this bunker development will cost something like 10m. That’s 1% of your wealth. It would be the same as the median American spending $1920 in pure relative terms, but probably would have an effect more like $500 on their real finances (again, every other need has been financially met long, long ago)

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well, because I’m not a sociopath I think preserving the world’s ecosystems is more important than a few years at the tail end of my life. Doomsday bunker with a Mad Max stockpile wouldn’t occur to me as a thing to actually do.

        • paranoia@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Okay, cool. Probably so do a lot of billionaires, at least from a pure pragmatic POV of them not wanting their skull cracked open. The point is that for a tiny portion of their wealth, they can insure against a lot of more realistic severe problems (unrest, riots, communism arising in the US, war, assassination, widespread famine), in addition to more extreme and less likely problems (doomsday, machine uprising, environmental collapse).

          Frankly, were I a billionaire and able to see the choices Trump is making to make the average civilian in America jobless, penniless and hopeless, I would also be making a bunker in the wilderness or distant nation.

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Or you could use your indescribable wealth to prevent the things you need a bunker for.

            • paranoia@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah but you can’t though. Like let’s be real, you have 1bn, you’re not Elon Musk or Bill Gates level - and even they would not be able to stop an angry Donald Trump

              • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Not enough to fight the bigger fish, but 1 billion dollars is more than enough to make public works that aren’t just a front (all these assholes have some foundation that is, at best, a zero sum charity), making better community spaces so they’ll actually see you as a “good guy” instead of yet another fucking greedy asshole.

          • RedPostItNote@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Just people building their own tombs. Being a part of society is what keeps you alive. They already crossed the boundary by essentially removing themselves from it. It’s already over for them

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      To be fair, what could a single billionaire do? They are far more powerful than most, but they would have to cooperate with other billionaires to make that change.

      There are 3000 billionaires. Who is going to stick their head out if the necessary changes will be opposed by many billionaires as well as huge parts of the regular population?

      It would be better for society to improve itself instead of waiting for a solution by the billionaires. Difficult while being trained to be a consumer, but possible.

  • SSNs4evr@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    The crappy thing, is that while they plan on a possible collapse of soceity, they could just as easily plan on what to do about all the displaced workers created, by all their technical solutions seeking problems.

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hilarious and sad considering those techbros are creating the conditions for a possible economic collapse, such as playing with creepto.

    Oh yes, kinda reminds me of reading a chapter in World War Z (the book with its dark comedy is still more entertaining than the humorless movie), like how one character found himself on an island full of rich people… Guess what happened next?

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        A parallel, similar would be ghandis govt in the 70s, was murdered by their own bodyguards because the pm was targeting sikh people for persecution.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think there’s a kind of sunk cost fallacy at work with preppers. Many of them start with the notion that it’s good to be prepared, just in case. However, being prepared for this sort of thing isn’t a casual exercise. It’s a whole hobby.

      What if the collapse doesn’t come? All that time and effort would be wasted. Better do something to make it collapse.

  • guillem@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    141
    ·
    3 days ago

    If your way of making money makes you really fear people will be mad at you, you should be asking yourself what’s wrong with your way of making money. That is, if you care. But if you don’t care don’t whine.

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 days ago

    I always find it funny that people imagibe that in an apocalypse a modern fossil fuel vehicle would be any good. Unless you know how to modify the engine to use realistically self-producable fuel you will be able to run it for only a few months before all the fuel in the world degrades and starts destroying/not running the engine. Better off getting electric vehicles as electricity is actually easy to produce.

  • Secret Music 🎵 [they/them]@crazypeople.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 days ago

    The really funny thing about Spez is that he’s far from a power player in the tech scene, nowhere near the likes of Musk and Zuckerberg. But he so desperately wants to be that he actually just looks sad and pathetic in the process.

    Wtf is he going to do with his stockpile of motorbikes during the apocalypse? Start a Mad Max biker crew? What a fkn loser lol.

    • Ghosthacked@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      He’s just going to the next tier of cuck that provides bikes for the raiders that get in his bunker. They should keep him alive as a manservant when his little apocalypse plan falls apart.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        He will flee to musk’s compound in Texas at the first sign of trouble, trying to be part of his harem

      • fishy@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        I can just imagine this as a scene in a fallout game. Lonely old rich fuck hidden away for years. You ring the intercom and he’s so excited to hear another voice that he invites you in. Starts spewing shit opinions. You eventually realize he could’ve helped stop the apocalypse but built the bunker and profited instead. Look at all the loot. Inform him he can either become a smear on the wall or caretaker of your new place.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      He did what musk ask if him on moderating reddit twice, which let 2 waves of massive bans, plus the ongoing shadow and. And I heard they changed something. Recently to catch even the more sophisticated ban eveders

    • GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      I just want to know the evidence for the motorcycles. Is it really a “stockpile” of them, or is he a rich bitch and likes motorcycles like jay leno likes cars?

      • sthetic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I agree. Many people are imagining, “instead of using his vast wealth to fix the world, he dedicates all his money and mental energy to an elaborate bunker that will ensure his survival in a specific apocalyptic scenario he believes is likely to happen.”

        It might be more like, "amongst all the random wealthy-person shit he’s bought, there are guns and motorcycles (because he thinks they are cool) as well as a pantry full of canned food (because everyone should have an emergency kit and you never know).

        But I could be wrong.

  • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    3 days ago

    I read a book called Lucifer’s Hammer by Larry Niven many years ago about a comet hitting the Earth. There was a scene in the book, after the impact, where a rich guy manages to finally reach a place up in the mountains where he has supplies stashed, only to find that his employees have claimed it for themselves and won’t let him in because he’s basically useless in the new world of survival.

    If you were working for Huffman or Musk or any of the rest of them, and a there was a huge society ending disaster, would you let them in when they showed up or would you just shoot them down with their own guns? I know what I would do. I can’t imagine anyone letting them in.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      3 days ago

      It doesn’t even have to be so combative.

      Imagine being thrown together with 99 other survivors of the apocalypse and 1 of them was musk.

      There’s going to be medical people and trades people and farmers and naturalists and even people with governance experience from community groups et cetera.

      Imagine how utterly useless a billionaire would be in that context. Their entitlement would make them worse than useless. Like I’d rather be stuck with nanna who is just a drain on resources rather than someone who’s only skill is self interest.

      • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 days ago

        Now ask yourself why these guys are suddenly so obsessed with AI, chatbots, and getting rid of roles previously staffed by humans.

          • Seleni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            lol

            A delivery guy I know couldn’t make his (scheduled, daily) pickup at an Amazon warehouse because the robot security didn’t recognize him that day (despite being the usual guy, with a badge).

            So yeah, that probably will be the most likely scenario.

        • Taleya@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Which is just a thousand times fucking funnier to me given that i’m someone with actual technical knowledge who works in the industry as opposed to a kholed nepo baby with parental funds.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      people like musk, thiel,altman have built complexes in other countries( mostly thiel,NZ) in case billionaires finally becomes the target they richly deserved, how are they going to staff thier complexes? with harems of women in cas thiel men, and slaves, willing to go with them.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Being hired as security at a billionaire’s Hawaiian apocalypse bunker has got to be the best job imaginable. You get paid to live in a tropical paradise in case The Worst should happen. If The Worst actually does happen, you just go inside the bunker and lock the doors, and if the billionaire shows up, you don’t let him in. Easy peasy.

    • Flemmy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Didn’t read the book but I get the scenario after a hypothetical world changing disaster, it’s going to be a ratrace for high ground. It’s a false sense of security to believe hoarding cash or guns or vehicle would be your ticket out of it, it’s called pride and hubris.

      A motor/car can’t swim. Weapons are a sign of hostility. Cash could be useless. Even having access to an escape satellite doesn’t guarantee you’ll be hit by space trash or cosmic plasma streams. The Road is a example how depressing the aftermath really is.