Godric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agoHappy anniversary of the day absolutely nothing happened at nowhere square!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square159fedilinkarrow-up1944arrow-down146
arrow-up1898arrow-down1imageHappy anniversary of the day absolutely nothing happened at nowhere square!lemmy.worldGodric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square159fedilink
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 day agoNo. I looked at different testimonials and believe this estimation is safer and closer to a potential reality.
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·1 day agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre - Death toll section I believe I checked the numbers at the French page some time ago, and based on the diversity of reports and their background, I personally believed that it was around 500. I do get that people can estimate a bit more or a bit less though.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down6·1 day agoSo Wikipedia is what convinced you?
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 day agoWikipedia is a community-driven encyclopedia based on sources. All claims include a source. What do you want more? Those articles being on a controversial topic, have been moderated and are pretty well done in my opinion.
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-21 day agoYou should ask him about this : https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421 Seem to be too much for him.
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 day agoWe got it. They’re avoiding to answer or acknowledge your comment.
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-21 day agoNot my comment though. And he answer and acknowledged my comment fine. But not this one I wonder why. Edit : typo
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·1 day agoSo it was Wikipedia that convinced you?
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·24 hours agoI was convinced something happened way before this, but for the number of deaths, yes, that was my source.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·24 hours agoOk. They’d fail you for that in highschool
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·23 hours agoFor sure, that’s why I passed then. Stop talking nonsense please.
No. I looked at different testimonials and believe this estimation is safer and closer to a potential reality.
And those would be?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre - Death toll section
I believe I checked the numbers at the French page some time ago, and based on the diversity of reports and their background, I personally believed that it was around 500. I do get that people can estimate a bit more or a bit less though.
So Wikipedia is what convinced you?
Wikipedia is a community-driven encyclopedia based on sources. All claims include a source.
What do you want more?
Those articles being on a controversial topic, have been moderated and are pretty well done in my opinion.
You should ask him about this : https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421 Seem to be too much for him.
We got it. They’re avoiding to answer or acknowledge your comment.
Not my comment though. And he answer and acknowledged my comment fine. But not this one I wonder why. Edit : typo
He, not ‘it’
So it was Wikipedia that convinced you?
I was convinced something happened way before this, but for the number of deaths, yes, that was my source.
Ok. They’d fail you for that in highschool
For sure, that’s why I passed then.
Stop talking nonsense please.