He said at least once or twice daily, there were “mass casualty incidents,” meaning that 10 to 20 people were killed and up to 40 seriously injured. He estimated that at least 60 percent of the people treated at these times were women and children.

The 62-year-old surgeon broke down three times during his testimony

    • ad_on_is@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      and Germany… don’t forget the Germans, man, they do their best to stay relevant in this genocidal massacre.

    • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      45
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes with trump it will so much better! They’ll finish the job and we don’t have to worry about Palestinians anymore! 👍

      • LePoisson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think you’re missing the /s - I know you’re being sarcastic but I don’t think it’s clear because some truly horrible piece of shit humans actually think that way.

        • mlg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          No it’s more because these typa comments are showing up after 13 straight months of dems giving a free pass to Israel and then expecting demanding people to vote for them.

          • LePoisson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 month ago

            Please, as if any other party - well the one other party since USA has two parties and that’s it, at least when it comes to voting - has done anything.

            • small44@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 month ago

              Stop with excuses. The same two parties are winning because people decided to vote for them. While in many other countries newly formed parties was able to win in the first attempt.

              • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 month ago

                Other countries have representational voting. America doesn’t have a system that will allow any other parties, especially on first attempt. If America has ranked-choice voting, it too would have parties out the wazoo

                • c10l@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Which countries have ranked choice electoral systems? My home country doesn’t and it has at least 4 or 5 major parties, a lot of medium ones and many smaller ones.

              • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                The US political system is not other countries. How come people on this site are all about understanding systems except when that system stands in their way? How come so many people are experts on US politics and the political landscape therein without having studied it literally ever in their life? It’s honestly getting to be infuriating how little yall know and how far you think that knowledge seems to extend.

          • wertyuiop@feddit.rocks
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I do find it offensive to bring out petty political domestic politics on a news about genocide. America is not the center of the world, and worse, given that they are the one responsible for that shit, they should really keep a low-profile.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          No I think the sarcasm was obvious, it was just a trite and tired sentiment.

      • ad_on_is@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        In all seriousness… I’d really like to know what has gone wrong in people’s lifes to think and speak like that, without feeling the slightest bit of shame.

      • wertyuiop@feddit.rocks
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Nobody cares about your internal politics you know. This is serious matter. Sorry your favorite genocider lost but it’s on america as a whole. Please do not bring that shit here.

          • wertyuiop@feddit.rocks
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Absolutely, I fully trust america to scratch the floor and double down on the warcriming. Anyway, this news is not about america. They are merely paying for that shit. I find it undecent as shit to bring out your petty domestic politic beef on a news piece about genocide.

  • Harry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 month ago

    Which heinous gibbering cunt can look at photos of these poor injured kids and think “yep, doing good work right now”

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Hawkeye: War isn’t Hell. War is war, and Hell is Hell. And of the two, war is a lot worse.

      Father Mulcahy: How do you figure, Hawkeye?

      Hawkeye: Easy, Father. Tell me, who goes to Hell?

      Father Mulcahy: Sinners, I believe.

      Hawkeye: Exactly. There are no innocent bystanders in Hell. War is chock full of them - little kids, cripples, old ladies. In fact, except for some of the brass, almost everybody involved is an innocent bystander.

      Edit: In case anyone missed what I was saying, “This world is worse than hell war” is how I would interpret Sir_Kevin’s comment, and I’m a veteran.

        • HeyListenWatchOut@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          I am ashamed to admit that I saw “Hawkeye” and thought - “Wow… I don’t remember that bit from Endgame / the Hawkeye Disney+ show… I need to watch it again…” 😓

  • samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    You know what would help this situation? Letting a fascist become President of the United States. Again.

    • nyctre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      The earliest recorded use of an unmanned aerial vehicle for warfighting occurred in July 1849, serving as a balloon carrier (the precursor to the aircraft carrier) is the first offensive use of air power in naval aviation.

      If you need something more modern, these for example are from the early 90s

      • vxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I was only confused about the word shooting, but apparently Israel has a sniper drone since 2022.