• tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    ·
    2 days ago

    Both Legs, hands down.

    Hands are hard to emulate with prosthetics, whereas legs appear to have been upgraded

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Plus life in a wheelchair is still quite possible, whereas life with no arms would need so much more assistance from others I would think. Can’t write, everything would be speech to text, hardly any recreational activities to keep you entertained, etc.

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      This was my exact thought process. I feel like we’re much closer to human-like robolegs than robohands.

    • illi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      2 days ago

      Both Legs, hands down.

      Congratulatioms, you have no limbs now

        • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          That game has been mentioned to me like 3 times recently… I’ve been waiting for a sale, I might just have to go ahead & pull the trigger.

          • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            If you love roguelikes and you love open world games like Skyrim or the Fallout series, I think you’ll love it. The setting is like a blend of Dune with Fallout (fresh water is a big deal, technological ruins are everywhere, but there’s no 1950’s vibe, this is the extreme distant future).

    • I mean, legs are a problem; even with prosthetics, resection seems to be unavoidable, from the few people I know who’ve lost a leg. The issue is at least partially that there’s a lot of force being applied in areas and ways not designed to take it.

      Still, I agree with you; no question that is the legs. If it weren’t for the resection issue, I’d have a range of prosthetics, including springy ones. There’s a definite silver lining on that cloud; I can’t see any upside to losing both your arms.

        • Well, I’m no expert, but I do know a couple people who’ve lost a lower limb, and apparently it’s common for problems to develop with the stump, which are aggravated by the use of prosthetics. The consequence is that, every few years, they have to go in and remove a little more of the limb.

          My understanding is that resections are things that are needed on the decade timescale, but maybe more frequently. And I’m not sure everyone has this problem. I know only that the two people I know had to have them, and that they limited their prosthetic use - they said - because it increased the chance they’d need a resection.

          Maybe an expert can weight in?

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Many people would probably be fine if their non-dominant hand was replaced by a prosthetic, though.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Speech-to-text is pretty decent nowadays. You’re going to be a bit slower in applications that have a lot of keyboard shortcuts available, but that’s generally still very workable. Not saying it’s equal, it’s just not that bad compared to losing both hands.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Depends on the games you play, doesn’t it? Strategy games (non-competitive) or turn-based RPGs work fine with one hand. And I bet it’s possible to make a way to use at least the directional keys (wasd/arrows/d-pad) with your prosthetic, e.g. by rigging up one of those old school joysticks.

    • devfuuu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Omg, I didn’t get that far in the joke. I was just thinking that he was ignoring the stupid text presure by just being in the moment doing stupid nonsense stuff with his friends ignoring the phone.

        • devfuuu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          It is implying that the reason he was not answering the gf on the phone is because of the choice he was given at the last panel: he chose to not have arms, they cut his arms, and he can’t write a text on the phone anymore because of it.

          • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            wow. that is not my take at all. my take is he is not answering because hes talking stupid bullshit with his friends so is not paying attention to his phone as opposed to being out with a girl not paying attention to his phone.

  • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wanna know if he was allowed to say 1 of each would you go full left, full right, or 1 from each side. I would also imagine the arm side would absolutely have to be the non dominant one.

  • Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Use nose to swipe down on phone to unlock. Use virtual assistant to check messages. No arms, no problem ;)