In the United States, I’d probably name Oregon City, the famous end of the Oregon Trail and the first city founded west of the Rocky Mountains during the pioneer era. Its population is only 37,000.

  • Interesting_Test_814@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    In France it might be Y (population : 89), famous for having a one-letter name. Far from “anyone can still instantly recognise the name” but still probably much more well-known than any other town this size.

    Otherwise idk, feels like the only french city everyone would instantly recognise the name of is Paris tbh.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Germany:

    Bielefeld. Everyone recognizes the name, it’s marked on all maps, officially it has a football club.
    But in reality, it doesn’t even exist.

  • nfh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Not my country, but what immediately came to mind was one that has global name recognition, and minimal population: Chernobyl.

    It used to have around 12,000 population, but now it’s technically illegal to live nearby, and up to 150 people are estimated to live there today. It’s famous for being toxically irradiated as a result of the worst nuclear disaster in human history

  • finestnothing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    As someone in the US - I have absolutely zero recognition of the town of Oregon City. All I know about the Oregon trail is a bunch of people died from starvation and dysentery

  • Wolf314159@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    In the US it must be Springfield because there’s so fucking many of them that they named made a TV show after it.

    Stupid sexy autocorrect.

  • Fondots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    For the US, I’d say a pretty strong contender is Woodstock, NY, with a population of around 6,000, and of course famous for the music festival of the same name (even though the actual festival was something like 60 miles away in Bethel)

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      A good number of these are examples where most people don’t actually know that the name comes from a town. I feel like they shouldn’t count.

      • filtoid@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        I thought so too before moving here, but there’s two cities, and a lot of empty space (in the north in particular) with lots of towns and villages, it’s not like Monaco or the Vatican City in that regard.

        That being said, it’s still all very close together, you can drive from the northern most point to the south in about 1.5-2 hours.

        The funniest thing I’ve learned about the geography is that there is a North/South divide where people from either don’t trust people from the other.

  • Enkrod@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Ramstein, population ~5600

    Famous for the Ramstein Air base, the bombing of the air base, the Ramstein air show disaster and the band named after all of that.

    • Joe Dyrt@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I went to school on base, grades 1-4, mid 1960s. My takeaway: planes with Ramjets!

  • rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    In the UK it’s got to be the City of London. Famous for being an ancient city established by the Romans and awash with history, now one of the world’s biggest financial centers with a modern skyline of famously distinctive skyscrapers. It’s home to some world-famous landmarks like Saint Paul’s Cathedral and Tower Bridge, and has a population of about 10,000.

    The City of London is not to be confused with London, London, London or London.

  • ben_dover@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    we have a town called “Fucking” with only a few hundred people living there. the town sign gets stolen once a month

  • shapesandstuff@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Wacken, Germany.

    Population: 2110

    Home to one of the biggest metal festivals in the world with something between 70k and 120k people. I think Tickets are limited to 70k currently but the whole area is bascially transformed for a week

    • Enkrod@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      What’s more well known around the world, Wacken or Rammstein? Because Wacken is smaller than Ramstein and would be the better answer but my guess is that Rammstein are more known.

      • shapesandstuff@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Rammstein is not a town though, Ramstein(-Miesenbach) is.

        I think a good chunk of US american military folks are familiar with Ramstein air base, less so Ramstein-Miesenbach. Internationally I’d imagine even less of either.

        Even plenty Rammstein (band) fans aren’t familiar with the origin of the name, nor the town near the airbase :)

        I’d comfortably take a bet that Wacken rings more bells around the globe.

  • Akasazh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    In the Netherlands is probably Giethoorn, the ‘Venice of the North’ which has many canals instead of roads and is very touristy. It has 2.900 inhabitants