• MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I’ve been homeless twice. Thankfully I had a car and I could live out of it temporarily while I found some family to save my ass while I got back on my feet.

    If I hadn’t had family keep me from rock bottom it’s hard to say if I would have pulled out of those situations on my own.

    Unfortunately for many people they have little to no empathy for homeless because they have been lied to or attacked by homeless and they then view all homeless that way.

    I remember once in my teens I skateboarded over to a sandwich place to get lunch for myself and my brother. On the way there I passed a homeless guy with a sign asking for “anything”. I decided to get him a sandwich while I was there. Just a basic turkey sandwich or something as plain as I could think of. When I tried to give him the sandwich he threw it back at me and told me I should have just given him the money so he could get drunk.

    That experience really tainted my view of the homeless from that day onwards. Then later in life I would have two different girlfriends get grabbed by homeless people over the years.

    I have a buddy that lived downtown and the homeless people there were always breaking their windows and stealing their stuff. One of them set fire to the side of their house out of boredom. When the police came they just escorted him to the street and then left. He didn’t get tried for arson or anything. The cops don’t care. They have no system in place to deal with those people.

    Its easy for people to have empathy for a group that they have never interacted with. Anyone who lives near homeless or regularly interacts with homeless people will tell you that not all of them are good people who just got abandoned by society. Some of them are evil bad people who have refused help or just don’t want it. Most of them need mental support.

    It’s a very complicated issue and I dont think it has any easy or cheap solutions.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Same here on a few bad experiences trying to help

      • a guy asked for money to get a meal combo from McDonalds. I bought him the meal combo, so he keyed my car for not giving him cash
      • I suppose I can see this being taken the wrong way, but I tried emptying my pockets a few times, only for them to throw the counts on the ground. After that I started noticing homeless with coins on the ground around them

      Realistically, it doesn’t matter anymore since I almost never have cash. They seem to know that world has gone too, as I’m rarely solicited anymore

      • MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Yeah I haven’t carried any cash for years and most of the time I offer to buy them food they decline. Once in awhile they take me up on the offer and are thankful but I am still always a little worried they are gonna throw it in my face after that experience I had as a kid.

        It’s a shit situation all around.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yeah, I try regathering my donations to a non-profit that helps but what little I can give is lost in the mess.

          It seems like the best option

          • they provide the most beds of any shelter
          • most meals of any shelter
          • help getting jobs
          • and probably much more

          As long as someone is willing to come in and gets there before it fills up ……

  • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    My mom died when I was 20 and the old man sold the house and took off with anything of value while I was just out of electrical engineering and there was a big economic downturn in the early 90s … I crashed on people’s couches in crack house neighborhoods and sometimes slept under bridges or highway overpasses… Had no car - no job and lucked into a job at Sears selling PC’s back when windows 3.11 was king. I earned enough to buy a bike and bike my way to work from wherever I was crashing and bought a damned pink barbie backpack from a tag sale for 2 bucks so I could bring my suit jacket and tie required in those days and I took a damned ribbing until I could get a better situation. People that have a fallback are lucky as hell and should consider themselves so.

  • xorollo@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Homelessness is not only living on the street either. There are lots of housing insecurities. Some people may move back in with family but the location isn’t safe or welcoming.

    I’ve seen many young mothers face this exact situation, often even when that same family pressured her to carry the pregnancy to term.

  • taxiiiii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    My parents wouldn’t even have the fucking space to let me stay.

    And then we have people like musk, who grew up with a golden spoon and view those on social security as parasites.

  • Hyphlosion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    For real. And I don’t. I always feel humbled when I see a homeless person because I’m just a hop and a skip away from being in their predicament. All it would take is an unfortunate event or two.

  • Puzzlehead@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yep, anyone can be homeless.

    If you sell your house and are between houses now, technically you are homeless but you’re privileged you can live in a hotel or rent a storage unit and couch surf or if you have a friend or family member to stay with. If you have a job, you can still afford shelter and not lose everything. This was my family when my brother was a baby and we just stay with a friend for 2 months until we moved into our new house. Both of my parents had jobs. We were privileged.

    If you’re evicted because you lost your job or got sick so you were unable to afford to pay your rent. Not all landlords give you a grace period to get behind in rent when something out of your control happened. These people also lose everything if they had no friends or family to help out. If they live paycheck to paycheck, they couldn’t save money. Many Americans are one paycheck away from homelessness. It just means if they get sick or get into an accident or lose their job, they’re screwed.

    • jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      it’s not bad luck. saying that is disingenuous.

      homelessness of the societal nature and scale that is present in america rn is not the historical norm. it is absolutely despicable how western culture encourages extremist individualism to such a degree as to destroy communities. even today, in the fucking present, people not from the west often think it’s bonkers how callous and unfeeling the west is. it is not some sort of natural condition for society to hatefully cast aside its most vulnerable individuals to the wolves.

      the oklahoma state government encouraged on their tourism board website a halloween themed “roadtrip” through all the “sp0oooOky OK ghost towns”… my friends and i saw it that year in high school and decided to go. do you know what we saw in these abandoned towns? a whole separate shadow society. there are millions, yes zero hyperbole, millions of unaccounted for people just here in america alone; having to build a community off the disgusting scraps of industrial civilization. millions of people not included in any sort of statistic or thought about by you or i. they’re forgotten in the most despicably sinful act against the sanctity of life itself. if there is a god, i can only hope he punishes the transgressions of our society that allowed this to come to term, normalized it even.

      wake tf up. this is an attack on you, your friends, and your family. this is class warfare and these people are on the front lines. homelessness is a civil dunkirk. the images of the brother dying to overdose alone in the wilderness on the cold hard ground, the mother suffering the birth of her bastard of rape in the arms of only the cold & dark unfeeling city, the father attempting to slash his throat and leaking into a pathetic puddle of pitiful death on the alley floor, the sister wandering the wilds as her body gradually decays in spite of her divine spark of soulful life - these all should inspire a sense of community and pride that are ruthlessly held up by a white-hot rage against the machine. these people are not others. they are you. the beast prefers you not recognize yourself as its prey.

      i’d consider myself an atheist. maybe a pantheist at most. but to so brazenly violate the tenet of love thy neighbor will be our greatest downfall. as the walls of modern society crumble down to the ebb of time people will not recognize their mistakes. people will run around, like headless chickens, in fear of consequences that have already came. if it is possible that some cosmic force will relent and save us some which way, i can only pray.

  • RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Forced Homelessness is the policy of many Governments and the DOJ in the United States as a means of punishing those they are after without any due process. Your ability to work or even have ID can be taken from you if they choose to do it. Your money can be taken. Your bank accounts can be frozen.

    City, State and Federal Governments have been creating these zones where large numbers of homeless and poor people are forced into with a kind of virtual redlining. Usually, these are downtown areas in major cities, and then the system creates the ability to target them with systemic drug usage, even to the point of the government supplying pipes and needles for people to use. They are given just enough food to stay alive while forced into this position. No employers are going to hire anyone and it isn’t like it used to be where someone can just walk into a factory and make enough money in cash to live for a week.

    In many ways it is a public execution system that just operates very slowly and you’ll only occasionally notice the dead body— which even are often not recorded as a death correctly, and it’s nothing you will see in the obituary sections of your newspapers. Imagine a system that lets tons of your former neighbors die slowly on the street while everyone walks by inside their little tech bubbles of safety, confident in the belief that it could never be them.

    At some point, it’s really about your view of a human life versus your value of money. At some point along the way, it was decided that the amount of money someone has at that point in time determines their value as a person to even keep existing, or to have basic rights…

    If Governments wanted to solve the problem, they could find a building to put people in, they could force drug rehab on some, others probably should be in jail. The ones willing and able to work should be given the opportunity, with a path out of the state imposed public execution systems, and back to a life where they are capable of taking care of themselves.

      • RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        “When one individual inflicts bodily injury upon another such that death results, we call the deed manslaughter; when the assailant knew in advance that the injury would be fatal, we call his deed murder. But when society places hundreds of proletarians in such a position that they inevitably meet a too early and an unnatural death, one which is quite as much a death by violence as that by the sword or bullet; when it deprives thousands of the necessaries of life, places them under conditions in which they cannot live – forces them, through the strong arm of the law, to remain in such conditions until that death ensues which is the inevitable consequence – knows that these thousands of victims must perish, and yet permits these conditions to remain, its deed is murder just as surely as the deed of the single individual; disguised, malicious murder, murder against which none can defend himself, which does not seem what it is, because no man sees the murderer, because the death of the victim seems a natural one, since the offence is more one of omission than of commission. But murder it remains.”

        Well said!

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    No one should judge homeless people. It’s easy to judge being in a privileged position, but without having experienced bad shit yourself you should just shut the fuck up. Maybe help the less privileged, otherwise you will be judged by my.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I don’t think people judge them specifically, around me are a lot of scammers, making it very difficult to know who needs “help”

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Yeah, there’s that too. A decade or more ago, our local paper ran an expose on the scammers, but they kept it reasonably constructive, giving equal space to strategies for identifying those in actual need.

        For my teens, I kept it simple

        • someone actively soliciting you in a high traffic area is likely a scammer
        • someone sitting quietly, trying to “shrink” away from attention, whether they have their hand out or not, is more likely in need
      • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That shouldn’t be a reason to ensure more money to go to the ultra rich while making the lives of the poor even more miserable.

        • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          But you can’t tell if they really need help. Look up the fake violin beggars. It’s very similar, panhandle all day, then go home.

          What does that have to do with ultra rich?

          Who said we’re making their lives more miserable?

          • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            The western world is heading towards the right, destroying social structures in governments. Increasing taxes for the poor, grocery costs, rent and house prices, stripping health care and education systems. While at the same time we ensure the ultra rich get more power and money and can continue not paying any taxes.

            But your argument is also wrong. Just because you can’t tell who really needs help you don’t help anyone? Just because a car can have an accident you don’t drive at all? Do you think the street violin players are rich? In my city there’s an east European gang dropping off beggers at certain spots, forcing them to beg. It’s very clear who’s part of this organization and who’s a local homeless person. I always give our local homeless money or food. I volunteer at a venue where the homeless can get free coffee or tea and twice a week a free meal. I vote left, I live in a left city and I speak out for social structures and against nazis. Friends who are struggling financially I financially support, like my past holiday to Cambodia, 2 of my friends and I payed for the entire holiday of one of our friend so he could join us. Every bit helps, even the smaller ones.

            I’m struggling in life as well, just not financially (PTSD). I get support from friends and the government. It helps me to live from day to day. There are people judging me, telling me “just have a different mindset”. These are people who never had a struggle in their life. They are completely lost when they ever hit an obstacle in life, but until then they don’t care about others who struggle and they judge them for “not making different choices” etc. “Why don’t you get a job and buy a house”, while this homeless person lives in a constant psychosis and can’t do anything else then play air guitar on the streets. Or because this guy won boxing championships back in the days which got him extreme brain damage, ending his career and putting him on the streets drowning him in alcohol and drugs. These are our most famous homeless persons, who have died in the past 3 years. But everyone has their own story and reasons for why they ended up in the fucked up position no one wants to be in. Even the beggers who are forced to work for this criminal organization. I feel sorry for them, I just don’t know how to help them because everything goes to the criminals who control them and keep their passports.

            • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              Just because you can’t tell who really needs help you don’t help anyone?

              Please direct me to where I said this.

              So people should give up their money to anyone who asks? I’m far from rich, I work hard for the little I have. I’m not giving it away just because someone asks. Charity begins at home. Of course I’d like to help more, there are a lot of things I wish were different, but I’m not compromising my life, financial safety, risking it for a stranger who I know nothing about. I’ve got people that depend and rely on me.

              I’ve bought food for those that needed it, walked him right to the counter of a local taco place and let him order whatever he wanted. I’ve given away a duffle bag full of shit I just bought, specifically for a guy standing outside CVS in cold weather. I give away tools and equipment to neighbors that could make their life a little easier, but handing over cash to someone you don’t know that could be a scam? Why not just send your money to Indian call centers?

  • Sean Tilley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    my view of homeless people changed forever when I learned that more than half of them were foster kids who aged out of the system and were left with no family or resources.

    Jesus, that’s dark.

    • Luccus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sure, it may sound bad when children become homeless. But have you ever thought about how much money it saves? Just think of all the good things we can afford with all that money!

      Like anti-homeless park benches. Or those little speakers that emit ultra-high-pitched sounds so that young people don’t … enjoy … existing somewhere or something, idk.

      And just because I’m unable to actually satirize reality at the moment, yes, /s

    • butter@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think the second guy had it backwards.

      Wikipedia (If you don’t like it, use it’s sources):

      Nearly half of foster children in the US become homeless when they reach the age of 18

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Backwards as in “less than half” vs “more than half”.

        Yeah that’s just the telephone chain effect (or whatever they call it).

        1: Source says 45%
        2: Guy reads source and says “nearly half”
        3: Chap listens to Guy and says “half”
        4: Dude listens to Chap and says “more than half”
        5: Uni-Grad hears Dude and says “a significant amount of”
        6: Media hears Uni-Grad and says “almost all”

          • ulterno@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Ahh right. I didn’t notice that part.

            Guess I should have read the image as carefully as your text.

        • Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          between 2 and 3 there is a step that goes from “nearly half” to “roughly half” and that is what makes that jump easier you would also likely see that between 3 and 4.

          however 2-4 are not needed because 45% is by most metrics a “significant amount”

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Even worse a ward of the state loses ALL benifits permanently if they are convicted of any offense, guess how motivated social workers are to find an excuse? For anyone that’s never been through these systems when you spend a lot of time with a social worker, I’ve never been more clearly threatened more credibily by anyone my entire life. I told one that I needed help with child care and they said ‘‘you don’t want to tell ME that, if you’re having such a hard time watching your kids, maybe you need them removed by CPS, I can have an office over there before you get home if you’d like, or can you manage without talking to be about it?’’ Imagine being 18, right out of foster care, trying to get enployment or training through health and human services, and they know all they have to do is get you on any technicality and case closed. I know they’d get you a job with a van picking you up, and let police have a look at your ID and run it to find any lapse. Had a cop pull over a van with 8 people, never even talked to the driver, just demanded everyone in the van give over ID and, clearly targeting, went right for one guy and ‘‘found out’’ he had failed to report the job we all started that day to his case worker who set up the job assignment, and got him charged right there. The business we were hired by was furious, because apparently they’ve lost vital numbers of workers this way, and the social workers did this fairly regularly, also the amount of times they send you paperwork that gets to you on the 9th, and had to be turned in by the 8th was VERY precise and consistant. The welfare state isn’t about helping anyone, it’s about reducing the burden on the tax prayer by any means necessary. They do not care about getting you kicked out permanently. They want your case closed.

    • AlexLost@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s because those orgs have been captured by their enemies, people that don’t want to help. They blame the people that need the services as being leeches, but they are the ones getting paid to fail at their jobs. They don’t want to see it succeed, they want it to fail so they can say how bad the system is.

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        When you have decades of Republicans putting poison pills into every law and passing bills that create as much disfunction as possible this is the end result.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    174
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    fuck.

    One in four foster kids will end up homeless.

    https://nfyi.org/issues/homelessness/

    up to 3 out of 10 homeless people are foster kids who aged out.

    what the fuck.

    I thought it was bad enough knowing about the veteran rights.

    some of the studies show higher rates.

    The studies. on the homeless children.

      • koella@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        90
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        So when conservatives want to ban abortions they are basically trying to increase the flow in this pipeline to get more prison slave labor

        • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not trying to defend their position but young kids given up for adoption at or near birth are overwhelmingly adopted. There are lines and a whole grey market.

          It’s kids with shitty parents that get removed after the toddler phase that tend to end up in the system long term.

        • ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          40
          ·
          3 days ago

          10000% yes. The easiest people to manipulate are the desperate and manipulators love dangling carrots.

          What’s worse is that this is easily recognizable but nothing will ever be done about the nutjobs who enjoy watching others suffer at their hand.

          There is no reason to believe we don’t live in hell

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            But “poors” “ruin” “great American cities”

            Make me a billionaire. Say now I’m a super selfish billionaire. I’m OK with having to ride my limo through SF, routing around the Tenderloin, to rub shoulders with those Silicon Valley MAGAs at their fundraisers? Why don’t my buddies and I stop the madness, call it Euthanize The Poors if we have to, but with crime down security costs go down too and any reproductively-derived assets (children) must be safer…

            Gated communities are cool but sightseeing is part of life. I’m a selfish billionaire but I can’t visit Honduras safely b/c I haven’t fixed global poverty, now I never get to see it. My yacht is good enough for me I guess fine

            • Anegro_Montoya@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Billionaires go to Honduras and fuck kids probably. They can go anywhere they want and do whatever they want unless they fuck with someone with more money and power, then they’ll suck that person’s dick.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Multiple angles really.

          Biggest one is that a child is both a financial and mental stress on a parent, and our society overwhelming believes that children are primarily the responsibility of the mother. By attacking abortion, they basically saying that every woman is just one sexual assault away from a lifetime of financial, emotional, mental and social duress.

          The second reason is class stratification. The financial stresses impact less wealthy families or individuals disproportionately, and less wealthy people cannot afford to travel to areas where reproductive care is legal, nor can they afford the lawyers required to fight the potential criminal cases or just pay their fines. The rich conservatives bankrolling these anti-abortion groups aren’t threatened or beholden to the policy they create.

          The third reason is racism. Black women are more likely to seek abortions, partly because they suffer a higher incidence of sexual assault, but also because they have less access to reproductive resources and education. Republicans have dog whistled this in the past by trying to say that abortions are racist because black women have a disporportionate number of abortions, even going so far as to call it a Democrat genocide on African-Americans. This dog whistle shows their true intentions; force financial, mental, and social stress in ways that are “equal” along racial lines, but not “equitable”.

          You could say that religion is a 4th reason, but I don’t consider it a real reason, and they cherry-pick their religious convictions anyway. You see those motherfuckers eating shellfish and wearing blended fibers all the time.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well yeah, obviously.

          It can’t possibly be because of religion, because all of them would be damned to hell five times a day for several other reasons.

          • theangryseal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            People can easily justify their own sin because they know exactly what motivates them, which is usually some other bullshit they justified to themselves already.

            I have witnessed some serious mental gymnastics in my life regarding such things.

            I knew a man so religious that he wouldn’t dream of letting a woman live with him if he wasn’t married to her, but he wasn’t really cheating on their two decade long relationship, because they weren’t married.

            And boy oh boy, a personal relationship with god affords you all sorts of leeway. Throughout the history of Christianity, what the church had to say was very important. Not anymore. The religion has evolved so that every man is a priest, and Jesus is just wearing shades and riding shotgun wherever they go.

            “I’ve never actually read the bi-buhl, but I have a personal relationship with Christ so… and when I have trouble, I just open a random page and read until I find something I relate to. That’s how he guides me, that and the feelings I have in my heart.”

            Amazes me.

        • WhatSay@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Yep, people are only a commodity to be manipulated by the capitalist systems

    • greenhorn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also black families are over-policed, and their kids more likely to be put into foster care “National estimates suggest that 53% of Black children will experience CPS contact by age 18, as compared to 28% of White children” “We consider that, at their root, these inequities are the consequence of systemic racism: there is no inherent relationship between race and child maltreatment. Rather, race is a proxy for the societal and institutional privileges and oppressions people experience because of their membership in a racialized group” https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9325927/

      Movement for Family Power is a great advocacy organization if you want to get involved https://www.movementforfamilypower.org/

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also impacts Native Americans. ICWA was put in place to basically stop DHS from kidnapping native kids. (The Right has been waging a war against ICWA for a while too - they tend to be against any form of oversight in child welfare/adoption. They want kids to go to “quiverful” white families)

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        “National estimates suggest that 53% of Black children will experience CPS contact by age 18, as compared to 28% of White children”

        Holy shit both of those are so high, and the the difference is also crazy

        • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          To be fair the word contact is kinda sus. I had CPS “contact” when I broke my arm in kindergarten.

          I was pushed off the play ground by another kid while at school. My parents were both at work. I had a lot of bruises they also didn’t like. I remember getting questioned about it at the hospital for what felt like forever. They kept pointing out scrapes and bruises and asking how that happened. I had no clue and kept saying from playing.

          That sounds like the bare minimum to qualify as contact.

          • greenhorn@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Those contacts can be compared to a broken taillight or stop and frisk—it’s an opportunity to probe deeper and find anything at all to justify further surveillance and actions taken against families who are often impoverished and the hard life that creates.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        there is no inherent relationship between race and child maltreatment

        The pipeline is systemic racism -> poverty -> child maltreatment.

  • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Liberals are also to blame for gaslighting and selling workers out to the capital class for 50+ years. The last Democrat President that actually fought for the proletariat was FDR with his New Deal programs.

    Yes, liberals were less evil than Republicans, but when Obama tried to give us universal healthcare they stabbed him in the back and when Bernie set multiple grassroot funding records, they conspired against him and stabbed the entire nation in the back. So if we factor in the opportunities for real leftist leadership that liberals stole from us than that opportunity cost is nearly as damaging as what Republicans are doing.

    • illegible@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      nearly as damaging

      really? More BS false equivalence. The liberals where never in control enough to make any of that happen. They may not be perfect by any means but to say they’re “nearly as damaging” as the right is just ridiculous.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Convenient that when the GOP has a razor thin edge they get everything they want with almost no issue, but when DNC has a super majority they can barely get watered down health insurance reform.

        • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s the difference between ethical governing and the unethical abuse of power.

          If you want liberals to “get everything they want”, and ignore democracy, they’d have to do it unethically.

          Wouldn’t it be better if everyone played by the rules, and governed like they are actually working in the best interests of voters?

          • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            The real problem is most of the DNC don’t want the things they say they do to get elected. They get the same conservative money the GOP does to be sure those things don’t happen.

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Then let’s apply the same reasoning we did in November. Some unethical abuse of power is going to happen. Wouldn’t you rather it be less?

        • madcaesar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s a lot easier to get things done when you get to cheat while the other side has to play by the rules.

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        In the past the Democrats did good things for regular people.

        Today’s Democrat party is incapable of doing good things for regular people. Literally no better than Republicans these days tho.

        There’s no false equivalence in comparing two arms of the same Duopoly.

        • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Literally no better than Republicans?

          You’re either a troll or completely brainrotted

          • Suite404@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yea… dems aren’t great and I’d love to see a new party. But, I do not understand people saying “the party that is bad at governing is basically as bad as the party taking over the nation through brute force.” Insane logic.